Capital Punishment †The Debate Continues :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

        As the war on crime continues, two truths hold steady  eliminating allcrime is im executable, and domineering it is a must.  The main weapon used tocontrol crime in this war is deterrence.  The governments deterrent forcommitting murder is the remnant penalty.  The attention of death leave alone not deter every person who contemplates murder from doing it.  Whether it is for religiousreasons and the hope of salvation or something else, stopping some people is notpossible (Cohen 48).  The intent is not to stop those people, but instead every new(prenominal) ambitious killer.  Capital Punishment has been in the national spotlightfor more years and the center of the debate still remains whether it actuallydeters would be offenders.  Does this age-old penalty for the ultimate sinachieve its goal?  in that location are many lofty and rational arguments on both sides ofthis issue.      & nbsp  Advocates of the death penalty claim that the primary reason for thisharsh penalization is that the fear of death discourages people from committingmurder.  The main ways in which they support this surmisal are  the severity ofthe punishment, various polls of citizens and prisoners, and two in accompanimentstudies.         The most obvious deterring justification is the severity of punishment(Calebresi 19).  This means, put simply, to punish for a crime in a way that thepunishment outweighs the crime.  If the punishment for robbing a bank is tospend one day in jail, past bank robbing would become a daily occurance.  On thesame note, if thither is a remunerate for a lost item of jewelry and the reward isless than the selling price for that jewelry, the finder has no reason to instituteit back.  On the other hand, if the reward exceeds the value of the jewelry, thenew owner pull up put on the line bring it back very promptly.  In the case of capital punishment,if a person wants someone dead badly enough, and the punishment for murder is ashort stay in prison, what will possibly keep that person from doing theunthinkable (Van Den Haag 68).  If a person is afraid for their life, then thestakes for their actions are much higher, probably even too high for most people.         Many psychologists believe that these stakes do not even withstand to be inconscious thought for them to work.  The theory is that a persons sense of right and wrongweighs out many factors in all instances.  While a would-be offender might becontemplating the deed, the death penalty imbeds itself  into that personssubconscience as a possible consequence of their actions, and thus the