Is Technology Making Us Stupider

Nicholas Carr starts his essay with the observation that his win book haveing and vast article writing habits have suffered immensely due to lack of meanness which can be attributed to the time being spent on the net income. He goes on to say that the gay beings are developing a newfangled reading habit which he doesnt think is best suited stipulation that there is much less concentration and even lesser contemplation. slice commenting on how the future researcher will not do a lot of reading, Carr paints a sad picture of the new generation of readers.While accept that his work has o backing from neurology and other(a) brain related science, Carr presents a theory that unlike the superpower to speak, which he says comes naturally, the ability to read has to be taught. Here in he says the profits is doing no grave to that particular ability. Carr makes a reference to the great German philosopher Nietzsche and his use of the typewriter. He quips near how the typewriter ha d made the philosophers work even more abrupt. Carr then reaches the fundamental topic of his essay the effect of internet on the cognitive ability of man.He says that man had a series of intellectual tasks in his daily tour all of which have now been taken everyplace by the internet He further adds that the style of the internet has been adopted by other media as well, further denting mans cognitive ability. Another key aspect of the internet that Carr says has dumber down the human brain is the conversion of an abstract concept to a concrete knowledge. This he says was previously done by the human being as an intellectual exercise but has now been taken over by the computers.Carr ends his essay on the note that in the medieval or so great hinders such as Socrates and Sacrificing have expressed similar concerns about new ideas such as the written language and printed working. On this note, he leaves the question open to the reader (Carr). Steven Johnson bases his book on deny ing the argument that papa culture has affected human intelligence negatively. He first refers to the slumberer curve to make a point that even the society that existed to begin with us had not discovered how cream pies could be a nutritious diet.However here he denies that just the fact about sleeper curve, which itself he draws from the movie Sleeper, can exhaustively prove his argument. He then goes on to suggest that the video games of today, contrary to popular perceptions Of spreading addiction through violent and vulgar content, are instead addictive because of their structural superiority. He says the games give the mind a lot to think and organize a task previously not natural to the human cognitive process. He further speaks about television and says that the TV has taken the instinct of the activated quotient to a higher level.He gives the example of reality shows and says that these shows have got a earthy understanding of the complex human engagements and relati onships. While speaking about the organic evolution of films, Johnson says that stories are no more being spoon-fed to the audience. Symbolic references made to avail the audience understand moments like flash-back have reduced and it is now pretended that the audience will understand what is going on. This he says has helped the people research and express their cognitive self much more than in the past (Johnson). Studies have found that the human brains evolution ceased over a gramme years ago (Connors).The technological advances that have been made in fresh history have scarce served to compensate in the declining intellect of the human mind. While people who live between 2000 to 6000 years ago had to play greatly on their mental strength to solve problems, the current availableness of technology and inventions eliminates this need greatly. However, the decline in intellect itself is not associated with the coming of technology but to deterioration in human genes (Conno rs). Neither of the cardinal theorists Carr and Johnson have made scientific claims in their arguments.These arguments however are presented in a logical format with each claim being reassert by significant arguments. Critics have remained vastly dismissive of both the arguments, craft the latter an absolution for couch potatoes and the former a little to a fault mournful too early. It is therefore clear that a real understanding of the effect of internet on the human mind can only be justified through neurological correlations and studies. However, human intellect has witnesses a decline for several thousands of years and hence it cannot be solely attributed to technology.