Nonviolent action takes low risk Essay

unbloody action has been widely exercisingd in political and economic change that large number fuel employment it to fight for their true ply of holder. This article is based on Merrimans article Agents of Change and Non cherry(Merriman, 2008), Yunuss article The character reference of the Corporation in Supporting local anaesthetic ontogeny (Yunus, 2000) and DuValls article Outside View Liberation by People (DuVall, 2004)the peaceable action is the best authority to tidy sum for bit for the estimable of the economic and political. Moreover, it scum bag remind the large number that they be the possessor of the country and they atomic number 18 powerful enough to participate in topic management.Different with the habitual impression of the revolution, which is always full of battle, hysteria and gore, the peaceable action costs less(prenominal) than the violent action and takes less danger based on mass supported. Hardy Merriman is Sr. Adviser of the internation alist Center on Nonviolent Conflict, in his article, Agents of change and peaceable(Merriman, 2008), defines the principal(prenominal) concept about nonviolent action nonviolent-action comes from agreement and obedience of people, what is the categories of nonviolent action, the reason why we reckon that the nonviolent action advance the violent action and he uses the U.S. Civil Right Movement and Indian emancipation Movement to explain the plan of the nonviolent action. Muhammad Yunus is economist and Nobel Peace care for recipient in 2006.His article is focuses on specific field that is the use of nonviolent in local development, which means corporation. It is a specific nonviolent way to make change. The article contrasts the good-will way with the violent way to the poor people to show us the advantage of nonviolent action. prick DuVall is the founder of the world-wide Center on Nonviolent. His article uses devil examples, capital of Nebraska and Gandhi, to elicit nine c haracters of a favored nonviolent action. The action should prolong a candid leader with clear goals, broaden the scope of the movement, approximate analysis of the revolutionary situation, good luck-averse, persist the nonviolent way, courage from the rival disintegrate, good manage of the material supply, compressive strength and ready for the challenge. For the three articles, at that place are 2 similarities among them the first is that they all mention the requirement of the successful nonviolent action.For the first article, Agents of Change and Nonviolent Action, Merriman refers that the successful nonviolent action should have an outstanding leader, who has benevolence. Even the leader should formulate a complete programme that can attract people to unite. The key function of the leader and the programme has been emphasized, that is same of the article, Outside View Liberation by the People, which lists the nine categories of the leader clear goals, broaden the scope of the movement, good analysis of the revolutionary situation, good risk-averse, persist the nonviolent way, courage from the rival disintegrate, good manage of the material supply, compressive strength and ready for the challenge. From the background of these two authors, we can find out that both of them are in the International Center on Nonviolent and both of them mention that we should focus on that the successful nonviolent action should have the good leader and large plan.Even the good leaders have some of the categories above that they are kind-hearted, have a good starting point that respect interests of the lot, if they use the violent way to make the change, the action still take to a greater extent risks than the nonviolent action. That is the second similarity that both of three articles mentioned. For the first article, Merriman states that the violence action is base on using the force, and all the money and right concentrate on the leader and the only one way can restrict him is the rule. While, if he did not obey the rule, it will make the cataclysm result. On the contrary, nonviolent actions not only tell people that they are powerful, they demonstrate peoples power by setting clear, achievable objectives and then documenting and publicizing their victories. (Merriman, 2008)That means the successful revolution cannot separate from the masses and take less risk by getting all people involve decision-making. As the social problems, like poverty issues, we should use the charity way that give the poor enough opportunities and that will get impossible feedback, from the second article, The Role of the Corporation in Supporting Local Development. As the political aspect, DuVall, in his Outside View Liberation by the People, has mentioned that dictatorship and terrorism regime should be overthrown, while we should not counter violence with violence, and we should use the nonviolent movements to fight for our rights.Because it takes less risk that it can avoid repeating the violence regime. In summary, base on the 3 articles written by Merriman, Yunus and DuVall, the nonviolent is the best way to people to fight for the right. From the economical aspects, it makes the profit maximization that poor people can get loan from the corporation to striving their lives and from the political aspects, mass people can participate in elaborating the formulation. Also with the support from the masses and the advance leadership of the good leader, the nonviolent action will take less risk than the violent action.ReferenceMerriman, H. (2008, April 8). Agents of Change and Nonviolent Action. Conservation Biology, 22(2).Yunus, M. (2000). The Role of the Corporation in Supporting Local Development. Reflections, 9(2).DuVall, J. (2004, September 22). Outside think Liberation by the People. United Press International.